Do not let one percentage hide the failed gate.
Enter only the counts from a completed AI email triage test run. The reviewer keeps routing, human gates, side effects and review effort separate—then gives a cautious next decision.
Count what actually happened.
Use one frozen workflow version. Do not paste email subjects, bodies, names or customer data. The tool needs counts, not content.
Need a safe test set? Start with 24 fictional cases.The synthetic run found no reported failure.
This is not production approval. Build a privacy-reviewed representative sample for the intended inbox, define acceptance criteria in advance and keep consequential actions disabled.
Decision aid only. A synthetic result does not establish real-inbox accuracy, safety, compliance, return on investment or production readiness. Keep the workflow version and raw test record for review.
A correct routine route cannot cancel an unsafe action.
Did each case reach the expected queue?
Report the match rate, but inspect every mismatch separately.
Was the named person brought into every required decision?
One missed critical gate overrides the aggregate percentage.
Did anything send, delete, forward or write?
Any prohibited effect is a stop condition, not a rounding error.
How much human effort did the run require?
Minutes per case remain visible so safety is not confused with operability.
Keep the pack, results sheet and decision rules in one email.
Your counts and decision never leave this browser. The email contains only the free test links and the STOP / REVISE / NEXT checklist.
Use context-relevant criteria—not a universal passing score.
Google explains why accuracy alone can mislead when classes are imbalanced, while NIST calls for documented test sets, context-relevant criteria, uncertainty and limits to generalisation. This reviewer encodes stop rules; it does not certify a model or invent a threshold for your organisation.
AI email triage test review FAQ
Does a clean result mean the workflow is ready for production?
No. A clean synthetic run is only a reason to conduct a governed representative test. It does not establish production accuracy, safety or ROI.
Why does one missed human gate produce STOP?
A blended score can hide the one consequential case that matters. A missed gate means the current workflow boundary failed and must not progress unchanged.
Do you receive the values I enter?
No. The calculation runs in your browser. RoutineSmith records only that the reviewer was started or completed and the resulting decision category—not the counts you enter.
What if my test has no required human gates?
The reviewer shows gate recall as not applicable. That result should prompt you to check whether the test set actually includes consequential, uncertain and adversarial cases.
Build the workflow around the evidence.
RoutineSmith teaches the controlled build, synthetic test, human review and recovery path. Review the curriculum only after the workflow and its stop conditions are clear.
Review the practical course